The Michigan Supreme Court addressed a curious issue, and provided an unsurprising result. Under Michigan law a child conceived after the death of the parent through artificial means is not a child of that parent when it comes to collecting Social Security benefits. The holding was made in Mattison v Social Security Commissioner. The United States Supreme Court had previously indicated that this question is a function of state law, and Michigan’s EPIC seems pretty clear on this point. However, it took a certified question from the Federal District Court in which these facts were in play in order to have the law established. If Michiganders want a different result they will have to amend EPIC.
Sperm Donor Case
By Doug Chalgian on January 3, 2013
- All
- Aging Issues
- Appeals Michigan Court of Appeals
- Asset Protection
- care giving
- Cases, Statutes and Court Rules
- Estate Administration
- Estate Planning
- Government Benefits
- Hospice
- Household Goods Medicaid
- Litigation and Financial Exploitation
- Ambiguity
- Attorney – Client Relationship
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designation
- breach of fiduciary duty
- Capacity
- Capacity to Retain Counsel
- Construction of Will or Trust
- Constructive Trust
- Discovery
- End of Life
- Estoppel
- Expert Witness
- Fiduciaries
- Financial Exploitation
- forgery
- Guardianship and Protected Persons
- Joint Accounts
- laches
- Marriage
- Mediation
- Mistake
- Power of Attorneys
- probate court jurisdiction
- Sanctions
- Settlement Agreements
- Standing
- statute of frauds
- statute of limitations
- stepchild
- Summary Disposition
- Tortious Interference with Inheritance
- Trust Termination
- Unconscionable
- Undue Influence
- Wills and Trusts
- wrongful death
- Long Term Care Insurance
- mental illness
- Minor Guardianship
- Nursing Homes
- Real Property
- Special Needs Planning
- Uncategorized
- Vulnerable Adults
- writing