COA Says Don’t “Hyperanalyze” Confusing Codicil
By Doug Chalgian on February 27, 2021
A new unpublished case looks at how to construe a clearly ambiguous codicil when extrinsic evidence fails to enlighten the court as to the testator’s intent. In...
Lack of Diligence in Discovery Justifies MSD
By Doug Chalgian on February 20, 2021
Two siblings each petition to have a different version of Mom’s Will admitted. Through their respective attorneys, Bruce offers the 2007 Will and Jennifer offers a 2018 Will....
Two from the Asplund Clan
By Doug Chalgian on November 26, 2020
Two new unpublished cases from the Court of Appeals deal with Roberta Asplund and her malcontent child Randall. Roberta is subject to both a guardianship and conservatorship. At...
AFCs Not Protected by Med Mal Law
By Doug Chalgian on October 24, 2020
In a published opinion, the Michigan Court of Appeals announced that the law that shields many types of care facilities from ordinary negligence actions, by deeming them subject...
Missing the Snuggle Time
By Doug Chalgian on May 29, 2020
I’ve participated in a few court hearings via Zoom and had my first contested Zoom hearing this week. I understand the plan is for us to return to...
Another Stop at the Last Resort
By Doug Chalgian on May 18, 2020
Suitability to serve as guardian and conservator of an impaired adult is the topic of this unpublished Court of Appeals decision. To read In Re Guardianship and Conservatorship...
ILIT Survives Termination Attempt
By Doug Chalgian on May 17, 2020
[This post involves tax planning concepts and jargon. Some readers might benefit from a refresher on these topics before diving in. I’ve attempted to provide that refresher at...
Tall Tales and Back Woods Justice
By Doug Chalgian on May 2, 2020
This new unpublished decision from the Court of Appeals comes out of Ogemaw County. Ogemaw is a small out-of-the-way county, with a lot of rivers and trees. Right...
And In Other News
By Doug Chalgian on April 25, 2020
Let’s take a break from COVID things and look at a new published opinion out of Marquette and an unpublished opinion from Mt. Clemens. Getting Greiff over Erwin...
Strict Adherence to MCR 5.120 Required
By Doug Chalgian on April 12, 2020
MCR 5.120 is an important, often underused, tool to help litigants settle contested probate matters. One of the difficulties with settling probate cases is that you often have...
- All
- Aging Issues
- Appeals Michigan Court of Appeals
- Asset Protection
- care giving
- Cases, Statutes and Court Rules
- Estate Administration
- Estate Planning
- Government Benefits
- Hospice
- Household Goods Medicaid
- Litigation and Financial Exploitation
- Ambiguity
- Attorney – Client Relationship
- Attorneys Fees
- Capacity
- Capacity to Retain Counsel
- Constructive Trust
- Discovery
- End of Life
- Expert Witness
- Fiduciaries
- Financial Exploitation
- forgery
- Guardianship and Protected Persons
- Joint Accounts
- laches
- Marriage
- Mediation
- Power of Attorneys
- probate court jurisdiction
- Sanctions
- Settlement Agreements
- statute of limitations
- Summary Disposition
- Trust Termination
- Unconscionable
- Undue Influence
- Wills and Trusts
- Long Term Care Insurance
- mental illness
- Minor Guardianship
- Nursing Homes
- Real Property
- Special Needs Planning
- Uncategorized
- Vulnerable Adults
- writing
![](<iframe style="border: none; width: 100%; height: 510px;" src="/wp-content/themes/2017-chalgian-tripp/plantobe100-mailchimp.html"></iframe>)
 |
About The Author: Doug ChalgianI am an estate planning, probate litigating, elder law attorney. This is a blog for clients and professional colleagues. In it I offer my ideas about the state of the law and the practice of law. I believe we are living through a unique period during which the law (which is traditionally slow to change) and society are attempting to evolve to address the explosion of people living long lives. I find these developments fascinating and enjoy being involved in this evolution. |