Death Tax Talk Puts Planners on Edge

By Doug Chalgian on September 28, 2021

With a new administration in Washington, come increased attention to our tax laws, including laws that tax assets when people die.  For estate planning attorneys, this increased interest bring with it the possibility that changes may come which will impact their clients., and which may change the way they should be planning for clients in the future.

Executive Order Eases Witnessing Rules

By Chalgian & Tripp on April 9, 2020

Governor Whitmer signed another executive order last night, this one aimed at helping estate planning attorneys and their clients. The Order modifies the rules that require...

What Parents Promise

By Chalgian & Tripp on July 8, 2019

Clients often tell us that their parents promised them that when they die, everything will be divided evenly among the children.  Then, when they die, they find out that there is...

How Did Dying Get So Complicated?

By Chalgian & Tripp on May 31, 2019

People like to blame lawyers for everything that’s wrong with society, and in this case, they might be right - sort of. When we get sick, we see doctors. Nobody actually pays...

State Supreme Court Decides Important Medicaid Case

By Chalgian & Tripp on May 10, 2019

On May 9, 2019, the Michigan Supreme Court released a long-awaited opinion regarding Medicaid planning. In Hegadorn v DHS, the Court held that assets placed in a so-called...

The Importance of Boilerplate

By Chalgian & Tripp on April 8, 2019

Boilerplate will
What clients really care about is that their estate planning documents say who will be in charge, and where their property goes when they die.  That part of their document might...

Sweating the Small Stuff

By Doug Chalgian on March 25, 2019

sweating the small stuff
Clients sometimes get confused about the way lawyers use the word “property.”  In the legal community, the word “property” has a very broad meaning.  It means...

Best Practices for Family Exploitation Cases

By Doug Chalgian on March 1, 2019

From the perspective of the child who moved to New Jersey 30 years ago, the sibling who moved back into the family home to live with (and be supported by) his aging mother is a ne’er-do-well scam artist who took advantage of and manipulated his mother as her health declined so that, in the end, her entire estate passed to him by one means or another. From the perspective of the son who lived with his mother during those final years of life, he sacrificed to allow his mother to enjoy her final years in a safe environment outside of assisted living, and she favored him out of appreciation for that sacrifice.

Keeping your Treasures from Becoming a Garage Sale Bargain

By Chalgian & Tripp on January 25, 2019

Man at flea market
Most of us get a kick out of those stories about a valuable piece of art or baseball card that ends up being purchased for almost nothing at the Goodwill store or at a garage...

The Downside of a Deed in the Drawer

By Chalgian & Tripp on January 3, 2019

Deed Discovered
Sometimes the old ways are best.  But sometimes the old ways were never really all that smart.  Signing deeds and not recording them until after death is an old school approach...

Old Estate Planning Ideas Give Way to New Technology

By Doug Chalgian on December 5, 2018

Old Estate Planning Ideas Give Way to New Technology
As Duane Horton contemplated his death, he decided to use on app on his smartphone to write a message that explained how he wanted his estate distributed when he was gone. Under...

Long Anticipated Changes for VA Rules Arrive

By Erin Majka on September 19, 2018

Erin Majka
Clients who have served in the military and face the prospect of needing long term care for themselves or their spouse, often have questions about benefits available through the...
An Attorney's Duty to Effectively Communicate With Clients Under the ADA

A client with hearing loss contacts your office wanting to draft an estate plan.  She relies on American Sign Language (ASL) for most of her communication.  You freeze, what do you need to have to do?  The answer is simple:  you need to provide her with the aids or services that are required for you and her to have a normal attorney-client relationship.  Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), that will likely include a qualified ASL interpreter at your expense.

Per Stirpes and Right to Representation

By Chalgian & Tripp on February 1, 2018

Yes –“Stirpes”is a Word

In estate planning, lawyers sometimes use archaic legal terms. At times, these legal words are unnecessary and can create confusion. At other times, they are the best way of clearly expressing the client’s objectives. One of the phrases that often makes clients feel disconnected from the estate planning process is the term “per stirpes.”

Per stirpes is a term that is used to explain how assets are divided among future generations, if the persons who are named beneficiaries have predeceased the person leaving the gift. It is best understood by contrasting it with the other option: right of representation.

For instance, let’s say Joe has five children and leaves his estate to them in equal shares,but Joe lives to a ripe old age and three of his five children die before he does. Let’s also assume that of those three children, one has just one child, one has two children and the third has three children. Then the question becomes: do each of those six grandchildren receive an equal amount? Or do they each take the share of their parent, meaning one grandchild would get a fifth of the estate, two grandchildren would each get a tenth,and three grandchildren would each get a fifteenth?Under per stirpes, the grandchildren would get unequal shares.

Under right to representation, each would get an equal share.

A diagram might help:

Lou and Cindy each get 1/5 under either scenario.

Per stirpes would give Wanda Mary’s 1/5 share; Larry and Frank would share Tim’s 1/5 so they would each get 1/10,and Sara, Susan and Carl divide Mark’s1/5 and each get 1/15. Right of representation would give all of the grandchildren the same amount:1/10(which is 3/5divided equally among the six grandchildren).

Right of representation is sometimes referred to as equal at each generation. Per stirpes is about each grandchild having only an interest in their parent’s share. Per stirpes or right of representation would only make a difference if more than one child dies, and then only if those children have a differing number of descendants of their own. But it comes up, and therefore, it is important to be clear on this point.Good estate planning is, in part, about anticipating possibilities. It’s a good topic for you and your lawyer to discuss. The same rules apply to both wills and trusts. If your document doesn’t say, Michigan law assumes right of representation.

Fancy Legal Language Creates Confusion

By Chrysa Milholland on October 24, 2017

The words lawyers use when drafting wills and trusts should be clear.  A recent Court of Appeals case shows the problems that arise when lawyers use flowery language. In the...